Why the study?
Following evidence supporting catheter-based renal denervation for blood pressure reduction, guidance was needed for its appropriate clinical use, care pathways, and management strategy in France.
A French multi-society consensus statement endorses catheter-based renal denervation as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed resistant essential hypertension when managed by multidisciplinary teams.
RDN endorsed for resistant hypertension in expert centers; confirms sham-controlled RCT efficacy and extends to mandated multidisciplinary registry practice.
• Multiple studies support renal denervation (RDN) for resistant hypertension. • We endorse RDN for confirmed, uncontrolled/resistant essential hypertension. • Multidisciplinary teams in ESH Centers of Excellence or Blood Pressure clinics should be involved. • Endovascular interventionalists trained in renal artery and RDN procedures may perform RDN. • All patients undergoing RDN should be included in the French registry, France-RND. Several high-quality, randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, ultrasound and alcohol catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure (BP). A French clinical consensus document has therefore been developed to propose guidance for the appropriate use of RDN in the management of hypertension along with a dedicated care pathway and management strategy. The French experts group concluded that RDN can serve as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed uncontrolled, resistant essential hypertension despite treatment with ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system blocker and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic at maximally tolerated doses. Patients should have (1) an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥ 40 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; (2) an eligible renal artery anatomy on pre-RDN scans and (3) exclusion of secondary forms of hypertension. Additional indications might be considered for patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Any indication of RDN should be validated by multidisciplinary hypertension teams consisting of both hypertension specialists and endovascular interventionalists in European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Excellence Centres or ESH-BP clinics. Patients should be informed about the benefit/risk ratio of RDN. Expertise in renal artery interventions and training in RDN techniques are needed for endovascular interventionalists conducting RDN procedures while centres offering RDN should have the necessary resources to manage potential complications effectively. Lastly, all patients undergoing RDN should have their data collected in a nationwide French registry to facilitate monitoring and evaluation of RDN outcomes, contributing to ongoing research and quality improvement efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathak et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: