Why the study?
Does Impella continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support cause electromagnetic interference during remote magnetic navigation-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation?
Does Impella continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support cause electromagnetic interference during remote magnetic navigation-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation?
Impella mechanical circulatory support appears compatible with remote magnetic navigation-guided VT ablation without causing electromagnetic interference when specific precautions (manual mode, careful positioning) are taken.
May support case-by-case use; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
Key Teaching Points•Hemodynamic support by the Impella continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support device (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) seems to be compatible with remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation and did not result in electromagnetic interference.•To prevent electromagnetic interference of the Impella with the strong magnetic fields used in remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation, we advise careful positioning of materials as well as starting the Impella before activating the magnets.•Precautionary use of the manual mode on the Impella instead of the automatic mode is recommended during remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation. •Hemodynamic support by the Impella continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support device (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) seems to be compatible with remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation and did not result in electromagnetic interference.•To prevent electromagnetic interference of the Impella with the strong magnetic fields used in remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation, we advise careful positioning of materials as well as starting the Impella before activating the magnets.•Precautionary use of the manual mode on the Impella instead of the automatic mode is recommended during remote magnetic navigation–guided ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noten et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: