Why the study?
Maintaining medication adherence is important in treating resistant hypertension, and variable adherence can confound blood pressure trial results.
Does ultrasound renal denervation reduce 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure compared to sham in patients with resistant hypertension when accounting for medication adherence?
Does ultrasound renal denervation reduce 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure compared to sham in patients with resistant hypertension when accounting for medication adherence?
Changes in medication adherence, particularly improvements in the sham group, may confound blood pressure outcomes in resistant hypertension trials and explain the lack of between-group differences in the REQUIRE trial.
Poor adherence in 45% of RH patients may confound uRDN trial BP effects; leaves open need for adherence monitoring in future studies.
Maintaining medication adherence is important in treating hypertension, especially resistant hypertension (RH), and variable medication adherence can confound results in blood pressure trials. This post-hoc analysis evaluated adherence at baseline and 3 months using available urine samples from the REQUIRE trial, comparing 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (ASBP) lowering effects of ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) versus sham in RH. At baseline, 45% (26/58) patients showed poor adherence. Among patients with good baseline adherence, adherence was unchanged at 3 months, and uRDN patients had a decreased ASBP whereas sham patients did not. In poorly adherent patients, sham patients showed a trend towards increased adherence and a significant ASBP reduction, whereas uRDN patients did not change. Accordingly, adherence changes and the resultant ASBP reduction in poorly adherent sham patients may explain the lack of between-group difference seen in REQUIRE. Monitoring and maintaining medication adherence is important for future interventional studies in RH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kario et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: