Why the study?
Tobacco use contributes to endothelial dysfunction, a key marker of cardiovascular diseases, but the ability of related biomarkers to differentiate smokers from non-smokers needed evaluation.
Does cigarette smoking alter biomarkers of endothelial function, oxidative stress, inflammation, and lipids compared to non-smokers?
Does cigarette smoking alter biomarkers of endothelial function, oxidative stress, inflammation, and lipids compared to non-smokers?
Cigarette smoking is associated with significant alterations in biomarkers of oxidative stress, inflammation, and endothelial function, which can be used to accurately discriminate smokers from non-smokers using routine blood tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smoking-associated biomarker shifts support endothelial dysfunction links; leaves open causal inference and practice implications pending prospective data.
Aims: Tobacco use is involved in endothelial dysfunction, a key marker of cardiovascular diseases. The contribution of tobacco use in their development is assessed by endothelial dysfunction-related biomarkers in smokers and non-smokers. Methods: 138 smokers and 83 non-smokers were recruited. Parameters reflecting the endothelial function, lipid profile and oxidative and inflammatory status, were quantified. Data were used to determine their ability to differentiate smokers and non-smokers. Results: Elevation of inflammation and oxidative stress as well as alteration of endothelial function and lipids profile in smokers were observed. Two biomarkers combinations, including one implying only routine parameters, were identified and allowed to correctly classify >84% of cases. Conclusions: Oxidative status, inflammatory status, and lipids profile were shown altered in smokers, leading to endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction-related biomarkers were assessed in terms of their ability to discriminate smokers from non-smokers. The possibility of discrimination based only on classic parameters of blood test appeared conceivable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colsoul et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: