This review outlines the current advances and ongoing controversies in the multidisciplinary management of childhood sarcomas.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ongoing controversies in childhood sarcoma management warrant cautious multidisciplinary decisions; leaves open optimal chemotherapy, stem cell rescue, and surgery versus radiation roles.
Multidisciplinary care and advances in chemotherapy have dramatically improved the prognosis of paediatric sarcoma patients, but much work remains. There are new techniques for molecular diagnosis of Ewing's sarcomas and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, with molecular techniques of staging and subclassification under development. Osteosarcoma is a clinically heterogeneous disease which continues to resist biologic diagnosis, classification, or staging. In chemotherapy, the roles of ifosfamide and doxorubicin in rhabdomyosarcoma treatment remain unclear. While many children with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas undergo massive therapy with peripheral stem cell or autologous marrow rescue, the efficacy of these manoeuvres is debatable. Osteosarcoma appears to respond best to regimens containing doxorubicin and cisplatin, while the roles of alkylating agents, high-dose methotrexate, and carboplatin remain unclear. Ewing's sarcoma treatment increasingly includes surgery because of the risk of secondary osteosarcoma after radiation. Most osteosarcoma patients now have limb-sparing excisions, though amputation may provide better function and cosmesis with less risk of complications in some patients. The role of multimodal treatment including chemotherapy for the miscellaneous soft tissue sarcomas remains uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard B. Womer (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: