Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article discusses some of the consequences of collectivization and subsequent privatization of handicraft in C hina in the second half of the 20th century on ways of learning and modes of apprenticeship. It argues that, after the privatization of the ceramics workshops of D ingshu, J iangsu province, an ethos of sharing previously introduced by collectivization continues to determine the paths of transmission of practical knowledge and facilitates exclusion of access to knowledge from community outsiders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geoffrey Gowlland (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: