Key result
Intensive insulin targets normoglycemia in critical illness, though optimal glucose control remains debated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reviews cardioprotective roles of insulin and glycemic management in critical illness, highlighting ongoing controversy over optimal blood glucose targets.
Interest in the effects of insulin on the heart came with the recognition that hyperglycemia in the context of myocardial infarction is associated with increased risks of mortality, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock. More recently, instigated by research findings on stress hyperglycemia in critical illness, this interest has been extended to the influence of insulin on clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. Even in nondiabetic individuals, stress hyperglycemia commonly occurs as a key metabolic response to critical illness, eg, after surgical trauma. It is recognized as a major pathophysiological feature of organ dysfunction in the critically ill. The condition stems from insulin resistance brought about by dysregulation of key homeostatic processes, which implicates immune/inflammatory, endocrine, and metabolic pathways. It has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased mortality, increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and increased risk of infection. Hyperglycemia in critical illness is managed with exogenous insulin as standard treatment; however, there is considerable disagreement among experts in the field as to what target blood glucose level is optimal for the critically ill patient. Conventionally, the aim of insulin therapy has been to maintain blood glucose levels below the renal threshold, typically 220 mg/dL (12.2 mmol/L). In recent years, some have advocated tight glycemic control (TGC) with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) to normalize blood glucose levels to within the euglycemic range, typically 80 to 110 mg/dL (4.4–6.1 mmol/L).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2012) conducted a review in Stress hyperglycemia in critical illness, myocardial infarction, and cardiac surgery. Intensive insulin therapy (tight glycemic control targeting 80-110 mg/dL) vs. Conventional insulin therapy (maintaining blood glucose below 220 mg/dL) was evaluated. Intensive insulin therapy aims to normalize blood glucose to 80–110 mg/dL versus conventional targets below 220 mg/dL in critically ill and cardiac patients, though optimal targets remain debated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: