Why the study?
Sudden cardiac death causes 10% to 20% of deaths in Europe, motivating investigation into how well risk can be predicted by validating the US ARIC prediction model in a European population.
Does the ARIC prediction model accurately predict the 10-year risk of sudden cardiac death in a general North-West European population?
Does the ARIC prediction model accurately predict the 10-year risk of sudden cardiac death in a general North-West European population?
The ARIC prediction model for sudden cardiac death demonstrates good discrimination in a European population, but its low positive predictive value may limit its clinical utility.
Model discriminates SCD risk well in Danish adults; extends ARIC data but leaves clinical adoption open pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death is responsible for 10% to 20% of all deaths in Europe. The current study investigates how well the risk of sudden cardiac death can be predicted. To this end, we validated a previously developed prediction model for sudden cardiac death from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (USA). METHODS: Data from participants of the Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) (n=9988) was used to externally validate the previously developed prediction model for sudden cardiac death. The model's performance was assessed through discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit (HL) statistics suited for censored data and visual inspection of calibration plots. Additional validation was performed using data from the Hoorn Study (N=2045), employing the same methods. RESULTS: During ten years of follow-up of CCHS participants (mean age: 58.7 years, 56.2% women), 425 experienced SCD (4.2%). The prediction model showed good discrimination for sudden cardiac death risk (C-statistic: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.79-0.83). Calibration was robust (HL statistic: P=0.8). Visual inspection of the calibration plot showed that the calibration could be improved. Sensitivity was 89.8%, and specificity was 60.6%. The positive and negative predictive values were 10.1% and 99.2%. Model performance was similar in the Hoorn Study (C-statistic: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.77-0.85 and the HL statistic: 1.00). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the previously developed prediction model in North American adults performs equally well in identifying those at risk for sudden cardiac death in a general North-West European population. However, the positive predictive value is low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welten et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: