Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 3, 2005BMC Health Services ResearchOpen Access

Volume-based referral for cardiovascular procedures in the United States: a cross-sectional regression analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does treatment at high volume hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing CABG or PCI compared to low volume hospitals?

Population

3,997,733 patients in the United States who underwent PCI or CABG between 1998 and 2001.

Comparison

Treatment at high volume hospitals vs Treatment at low volume hospitals

Design

Cross-sectional

Follow-up

In-hospital

Authors

AEAndrew J. EpsteinQMedicSRSaif S. RathoreHeart Failure & TransplantHarlan M. KrumholzHarlan M. KrumholzGeneral / Preventive / Lipids

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May support volume-based regionalization for CABG/PCI; leaves open feasibility and causality given observational design and large transfer requirements.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of hospital procedure volume minimums on mortality rates for CABG and PCI surgeries.
  • Retrospective analysis of a national hospital discharge database (n = 4,997,733) from 1998 to 2001.
  • Comparison of in-hospital mortality rates between low volume and high volume hospitals for CABG and PCI.
  • Simulation of deaths averted by moving patients to hospitals that meet volume recommendations.
  • Patients in low volume hospitals had higher mortality odds for CABG (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10-1.24) and PCI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20).
  • Estimated 728 deaths could be prevented annually in the U.S. by adhering to recommended volume minimums.
  • Moving 232 CABG patients or 805 PCI patients would be necessary to prevent a single death.

Structured PICO

Does treatment at high volume hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing CABG or PCI compared to low volume hospitals?

P
Population
3,997,733 patients in the United States who underwent PCI (n = 2,500,796) or CABG (n = 1,496,937) between 1998 and 2001.
I
Intervention
Treatment at high volume hospitals (annual procedure minimums of 450 for CABG and 400 for PCI)
C
Comparator
Treatment at low volume hospitals
O
Outcome
In-hospital mortalityhard clinical

Adopting recommended hospital volume minimums for CABG and PCI would prevent an estimated 728 deaths annually in the US, but requires moving large numbers of patients, questioning the feasibility of such a policy.

Cite This Study

Epstein et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a762896c14fe0c475709206https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-5-42
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery1991 · 211 citations
  2. 2Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery1996 · 310 citations
  3. 3Patient Preferences for Location of Care1999 · 460 citations
  4. 4The Relation between the Volume of Coronary Angioplasty Procedures at Hospitals Treating Medicare Beneficiaries and Short-Term Mortality1994 · 283 citations
  5. 5Relationship Between Physician and Hospital Coronary Angioplasty Volume and Outcome in Elderly Patients1997 · 214 citations