This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
As demand for lithium‐ion batteries increases, the supply of materials is increasingly constrained by their geographical concentration. This has spurred significant research into recycling spent batteries to enhance resource circulation. Currently, commercially applied recycling methods (such as pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy) face environmental and economic challenges, including waste acid and gas generation, high‐temperature heat treatment, and operational complexity. A promising alternative is the carbothermic reduction process, which operates at lower temperatures, minimizing costs and environmental emissions. However, this method still requires large quantities of external reducing agents. Therefore, this study aims to introduce a simplified direct carbothermic reduction (SDCR) process. The SDCR process leveraged carbon conductive materials and organic binders within the electrode as reducing agents. Additionally, the high compaction state created a conducive environment for reducing gases, promoting efficient reduction and material recovery. This approach reduces the reliance on external reducing agents and streamlines the re‐upcycling process, making it commercially viable.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: