Why the study?
Is intracoronary electrocardiogram ST-segment elevation associated with culprit lesion location and myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI?
Is intracoronary electrocardiogram ST-segment elevation associated with culprit lesion location and myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI?
Intracoronary ECG monitoring before PCI in NSTEMI patients can detect ST-segment elevation, particularly in LCx lesions, which is associated with greater myocardial injury.
IC-ECG STE may flag higher-risk LCx lesions in NSTEMI; hypothesis-generating for pre-PCI monitoring utility.
AIMS: An intracoronary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) is a sensitive method to detect local myocardial ischaemia. We investigated the prevalence of IC-ECG ST-segment elevation (STE) with respect to culprit lesion location in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and its relationship with elevated levels of cardiac biomarkers. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 87 NSTEMI patients who underwent IC-ECG recording by locating the insulated polymer-coated guidewire distal to the culprit lesion before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cardiac biomarkers were serially examined. IC-ECG STE was observed in 24 patients (27.6%) before PCI, and was significantly more frequent in patients with LCx culprit lesions (LAD vs. LCx vs. RCA, 12.1% vs. 53.3% vs. 16.7%; p<0.001). Peak cardiac troponin I (cTnI) values were associated with IC-ECG STE, ejection fraction (EF), cTnI values on admission, and type B2/C lesions. In multivariate analysis, IC-ECG STE (odds ratio [OR], 5.04; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.51-16.85; p=0.009), and EF (OR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-1.00; p=0.043) were predictors of greater peak cTnI values. CONCLUSIONS: IC-ECG STE was not uncommon in NSTEMI patients, particularly those with LCx culprit lesions. IC-ECG monitoring before PCI may help identify NSTEMI patients with high risk of greater myocardial injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hishikari et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: