Why the study?
Does FCP1 overexpression reduce ET-1-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes?
Does FCP1 overexpression reduce ET-1-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes?
FCP1 plays an important role in regulating ET-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy by controlling the phosphorylation level of the RNAPII CTD.
Should not yet influence practice; hypothesis-generating for FCP1 in ET-1-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
AIMS: Cardiac hypertrophy is associated with the increase of total amount of RNA, which is in accordance with RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) activation via C-terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylation of the largest subunit of RNAPII. It has been demonstrated that endothelin-1 (ET-1) phosphorylates CTD at the hypertrophic response in cardiomyocytes. However, it is unclear whether ET-1-induced hypertrophy is affected by the CTD phosphatase, transcription factor IIF-interacting CTD phosphatase1 (FCP1). MAIN METHODS: We analyzed whether ET-1-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy was affected by overexpression of FCP1 or dominant-negative form of FCP1 (dnFCP1) in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. KEY FINDINGS: The level of ET-1-induced RNAPII CTD phosphorylation was decreased by FCP1 overexpression, whereas it was sustained by dnFCP1. Global RNA synthesis evaluated by [(3)H]-uridine incorporation showed that the ET-1-induced increase in RNA synthesis was suppressed by FCP1 and was augmented by dnFCP1. ET-1-induced increase in cell surface area was suppressed by FCP1 and was preserved by dnFCP1. Furthermore, the ET-1-induced increase in molecular markers of cardiac hypertrophy, expression of ANP and β-MHC gene, was suppressed by FCP1 and was not inhibited by dnFCP1. SIGNIFICANCE: ET-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy and CTD phosphorylation level are functionally regulated by FCP1. These findings suggest that FCP1 plays an important role in ET-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy via controlling phosphorylation level of the RNAPII CTD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakai et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: