Why the study?
Emotional carry-over can prospectively bias memory encoding of unrelated neutral information, but the mechanism of this process remains unknown.
Does paced breathing alter arousal and influence memory formation after viewing emotional pictures in healthy adults?
Does paced breathing alter arousal and influence memory formation after viewing emotional pictures in healthy adults?
Paced breathing after an emotional event alters psychophysiology but does not differentially affect memory based on breathing pace, suggesting that the cognitive shift of paced breathing itself may disrupt emotional carry-over.
Paced breathing does not differentially affect memory by pace after emotional stimuli; leaves open its role in arousal modulation.
Abstract The carry-over of emotional brain states can prospectively bias the encoding and recollection of unrelated neutral information (Tambini, Rimmele, et al., 2017), but the mechanism of this processes is unknown. The current study examined the ability for paced breathing to alter arousal and influence memory formation by viewing a block of emotional pictures and then a block of neutral pictures while breathing at a slow, normal, or fast pace. Control participants viewed two neutral blocks, with normal paced breathing during the second block. This was followed by a delayed memory test. Breathing pace was associated with changes to psychophysiology. Skin conductance levels were highest for those in the fast-paced breathing group and heart rate variability increased for slow-paced breathing and decreased for fast-paced breathing. However, memory did not differ between slow- and fast-paced breathing, suggesting that it is the shifting of goals – rather than the reduction in arousal – associated with paced breathing that may reduce the emotional carry-over effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dugle et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: