Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
National R&D programmes are an important means to raise investments for expediting national innovation policies. Since not all programmes are aligned with a government’s ultimate vision, the strategic fit of the R&D portfolio at the national-level should be monitored, evaluated, and managed. This study aims to evaluate the strategic fit of national R&D programmes with R&D policies and to offer advice regarding portfolio management from a national point of view for effective resource allocation. To this end, we use an approach that integrates the balanced scorecard (BSC) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The BSC model for R&D is used to translate national R&D strategy objectives into a set of coherent strategic fit factors. The AHP provides an evaluation of the strategic fit scores of national R&D programmes. Finally, the portfolio maps of strategic fit scores were developed for diagnosing national R&D programme portfolios. The proposed approach is applied to study a case of evaluating the national R&D programme portfolios for the creative economy policy in Korea. The BSC-AHP based portfolio map can be emphasized as a bridge between systematic programme evaluation and efficient strategic management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: