Why the study?
Attempts at incremental improvements in clinical outcomes by reducing MI size have not been successful, prompting a review of studies evaluating immediate-onset antiplatelet therapy during STEMI.
Does immediate-onset intravenous antiplatelet therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion?
Does immediate-onset intravenous antiplatelet therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion?
Immediate-onset intravenous antiplatelet therapy does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in STEMI patients compared to routine oral therapy, suggesting future research should focus on novel pathways like microvascular damage.
Immediate antiplatelet strategies have not improved STEMI outcomes; leaves open the need for novel adjunctive therapies.
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is still a large source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although early reperfusion therapy has been prioritized in the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis, attempts at incremental improvements in clinical outcomes by reducing MI size have not been successful so far. Herein, we review the studies that have evaluated immediate-onset antiplatelet therapy as attempts to improve meaningful clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Unfortunately, many of the adjunctive pharmacotherapies have proven to be disappointing. Recent studies performed in the background of routine oral administration of P2Y 12 adenosine receptor inhibitors, which may take several hours to take full effect, and aspirin have largely shown no improvement in outcomes, despite an earlier onset of antiplatelet activity of the investigative agents. Further progress in improving outcomes during STEMI may depend on exploring therapeutics that modulate the pathophysiology of microvascular damage during ischemia–reperfusion injury, a phenomenon whose effects evolve over hours to days. We speculate that the dynamic nature of the no-reflow phenomenon may be an explanation for these disappointing results with the intravenous antiplatelet agents. We hope that appreciation for what has not worked in this domain may direct future research efforts to focus on novel pathways. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury are very much still a lingering issue. Despite significant improvements in door-to-balloon times, rates of in-hospital mortality for STEMI remain unchanged. Outcomes following successfully reperfused STEMI are likely determined by the initial size of myocardial necrosis (ie, cardiomyocyte death during the period of ongoing ischemia), patency of the infarct-related epicardial coronary artery, possible reperfusion injury, the microvascular no-reflow phenomenon, and adverse remodeling after infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allencherril et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: