Key result
Despite intensive research, no pharmacological or postconditioning strategy has been shown to consistently prevent reperfusion injury or enhance myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI.
Why the study?
Do pharmacological agents and postconditioning strategies reduce reperfusion injury and infarct size in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Do pharmacological agents and postconditioning strategies reduce reperfusion injury and infarct size in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Current pharmacological and postconditioning strategies have not consistently demonstrated efficacy in preventing reperfusion injury or enhancing myocardial salvage in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Current strategies should not be used to reduce reperfusion injury in STEMI; leaves open effective cardioprotection targets.
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Reperfusion therapy by thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) improves survival and quality of life in patients with STEMI. Despite the proven efficacy of timely reperfusion, mortality from STEMI remains high, particularly among patients with suboptimal reperfusion. Reperfusion injury following opening of occluded coronary arteries mitigates the efficacy of PPCI by further accentuating ischemic damage and increasing infarct size (IS). On the basis of experimental studies, it is assumed that nearly 50% of the final IS is because of the reperfusion injury. IS is a marker of ischemic damage and adequacy of reperfusion that is strongly related to mortality in reperfused patients with STEMI. Many therapeutic strategies including pharmacological and conditioning agents have been proven effective in reducing reperfusion injury and IS in preclinical research. Mechanistically, these agents act either by inhibiting reperfusion injury cascades or by activating cellular prosurvival pathways. Although most of these agents/strategies are at the experimental stage, some of them have been tested clinically in patients with STEMI. This review provides an update on key pharmacological agents and postconditioning used in the setting of PPCI to reduce reperfusion injury and IS. Despite intensive research, no strategy or intervention has been shown to prevent reperfusion injury or enhance myocardial salvage in a consistent manner in a clinical setting. A number of novel therapeutic strategies to reduce reperfusion injury in the setting of PPCI in patients with STEMI are currently under investigation. They will lead to a better understanding of reperfusion injury and to more efficient strategies for its prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gjin Ndrepepa (2015) conducted a review in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pharmacological agents and postconditioning was evaluated. Despite intensive research, no pharmacological or postconditioning strategy has been shown to consistently prevent reperfusion injury or enhance myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: