Why the study?
Do genetic variants interact with age, sex, hypertension, and body mass index to influence atrial fibrillation risk in individuals of European descent?
Do genetic variants interact with age, sex, hypertension, and body mass index to influence atrial fibrillation risk in individuals of European descent?
The genetic risk for atrial fibrillation at the PITX2 locus is significantly modified by age, with a stronger effect in individuals aged 65 years or younger.
Age modifies PITX2 variant effects on AF risk in Europeans; leaves open whether other genetic-risk factor interactions warrant larger studies.
It is unclear whether genetic markers interact with risk factors to influence atrial fibrillation (AF) risk. We performed genome-wide interaction analyses between genetic variants and age, sex, hypertension, and body mass index in the AFGen Consortium. Study-specific results were combined using meta-analysis (88,383 individuals of European descent, including 7,292 with AF). Variants with nominal interaction associations in the discovery analysis were tested for association in four independent studies (131,441 individuals, including 5,722 with AF). In the discovery analysis, the AF risk associated with the minor rs6817105 allele (at the PITX2 locus) was greater among subjects ≤ 65 years of age than among those > 65 years (interaction p-value = 4.0 × 10 −5 ). The interaction p-value exceeded genome-wide significance in combined discovery and replication analyses (interaction p-value = 1.7 × 10 −8 ). We observed one genome-wide significant interaction with body mass index and several suggestive interactions with age, sex, and body mass index in the discovery analysis. However, none was replicated in the independent sample. Our findings suggest that the pathogenesis of AF may differ according to age in individuals of European descent, but we did not observe evidence of statistically significant genetic interactions with sex, body mass index, or hypertension on AF risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weng et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: