Why the study?
Does MSCT accurately assess bypass graft patency compared to angiography in patients undergoing CABG with T-grafts?
Population
26 patients who underwent elective coronary surgery utilizing a T-Graft
Comparison
Multi-slice computed tomography including volume… vs Arterial coronary angiography on postoperative…
Design
Cross-sectional, Interpreted separately by two different investigators
Follow-up
postoperative day 8
Authors
Loading...
MSCT may support noninvasive graft assessment after CABG; leaves open prospective validation of accuracy versus angiography.
Does MSCT accurately assess bypass graft patency compared to angiography in patients undergoing CABG with T-grafts?
MSCT is a reliable, less invasive alternative to angiography for assessing bypass graft patency after complex CABG, though it has limited ability to quantify stenosis.
Eifert et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: