Why the study?
Does therapy-reducing long detection time programming reduce inappropriate ATP and shock therapy in unselected ICD recipients compared to conventional programming strategies?
Population
1,471 unselected patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator between January 2000 and…
Comparison
Therapy-reducing long detection time programming… vs Individual ICD programming using…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 2.4±1.6 years, 2.3±1.6 years, and 1.7±1.2 years
Authors
Loading...
Therapy-reducing ICD programming was associated with fewer inappropriate therapies and unchanged mortality; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Does therapy-reducing long detection time programming reduce inappropriate ATP and shock therapy in unselected ICD recipients compared to conventional programming strategies?
Defensive ICD programming with prolonged detection times is safe and significantly reduces inappropriate therapies without increasing mortality in a real-world, unselected population.
Burger et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: