Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) reduce mortality and readmission compared to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy alone in older patients with reduced LVEF and prolonged QRS duration?
Population
7,090 propensity-matched patients older than 65 years with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and…
Comparison
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a… vs Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3 years
Authors
Loading...
May inform CRT-D decisions in older HFrEF patients; extends trial data to real-world Medicare cohort but requires randomized confirmation.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) reduce mortality and readmission compared to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy alone in older patients with reduced LVEF and prolonged QRS duration?
In a real-world cohort of older Medicare patients with HFrEF and prolonged QRS, CRT-D was associated with significantly lower mortality and heart failure readmissions, but higher device-related infections, compared to ICD therapy alone.
Masoudi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: