Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Real-world longitudinal data documenting the diagnostic impact of DNA methylation array (MA) profiling in pediatric ependymoma remain sparse. We report a single-center retrospective analysis evaluating MA-driven reclassification, molecular subgroup distribution, and long-term survival outcomes in a national pediatric referral cohort. Methods Sixty-three pediatric patients with a histological ependymoma diagnosis treated at Motol and Homolka University Hospital (2010–2025) were included. DNA methylation profiling, RNA sequencing, copy number variation and t-SNE analysis were performed. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results MA confirmed ependymoma in 48 patients (76.2%) and reclassified 15 (23.8%) as non-ependymoma entities, including newly described tumor types. The reclassification rate was 36.1% in the pre-2019 cohort versus 7.4% post-2019. Posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymoma was the predominant subgroup ( n = 26). Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 69.6% and event-free survival (EFS) 47.7%. Gross total resection was the only factor significantly associated with improved survival (OS 75% vs. 40%, p = 0.017). Chromosome 1q gain, identified exclusively in PFA patients, was associated with a high relapse rate despite standard therapy. Conclusion MA-driven reclassification affected nearly one quarter of patients, with substantially higher rates in the pre-molecular era, confirming that integrated molecular diagnosis is indispensable in all pediatric CNS tumors referred with a histological diagnosis of ependymoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trková et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: