Why the study?
The study aimed to determine whether relationships exist between eccentric hamstring strength, isokinetic strength imbalances, and biceps femoris long head architecture.
Does relative bicep femoris long head fascicle length correlate with isokinetic strength measures of hamstring strain injury risk in physically active men?
Does relative bicep femoris long head fascicle length correlate with isokinetic strength measures of hamstring strain injury risk in physically active men?
Relative bicep femoris long head fascicle length is significantly associated with isokinetic strength measures of hamstring strain injury risk, suggesting it is a more appropriate measure of injury risk than absolute fascicle length.
May inform targeted hamstring injury prevention in athletes; leaves open whether modifying these factors reduces prospective risk.
Ripley, NJ, Comfort, P, and McMahon, JJ. Relationships between modifiable risk factors of hamstring strain injury. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 510-516, 2024-The aims of this study were to determine whether any relationship exists between eccentric hamstring strength and isokinetic strength imbalances and bicep femoris long head (BF LH ) architecture. Eighteen physically active men (age 24.7 ± 4.3 years, height 181.9 ± 7.2 cm, mass 84.9 ± 12.9 kg) had resting BF LH muscle architecture assessed using ultrasound, with images taken at the midmuscle belly. Measures of isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors involved subjects performing 3 maximal effort repetitions of concentric knee extension and eccentric knee flexion at 60°·s -1 . Good-excellent relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.86) and low variability (coefficient of variation <10%) were observed for all variables. Relative BF LH fascicle length (FL) demonstrated significant moderate-to-nearly-perfect associations with isokinetic measures identified as hamstring strain injury risk factors ( p < 0.05, r = 0.38-0.92), whereas absolute BF LH FL was not significantly or meaningfully associated with isokinetic measures ( p = 0.07-0.961, r = 0.01-0.30). Relative BF LH FL should be considered when assessing resting BF LH muscle architecture because it is potentially a more appropriate measure of injury risk because of its greater association with strength measures. However, absolute BF LH FL may have a greater usefulness during growth, maturation, and individual proportions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripley et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: