The aim of this paper is to raise some questions about the uses of the approach 1 to social experience, a mode of analysis finding increasing use in social-psychological circles. In particular, we wish to inquire into and comment upon the nature of the actor's 2 perspective in everyday life, as this is sometimes assumed to appear to the dramaturgic analyst. To this end, we shall describe a perspective the world and the self within it, a perspective that renders life a kind of theater in which a is staged. Someone viewing self and world from within this perspective will be said to be on. In order to show the incompatibility of this perspective with the view that persons in everyday life seem to consider natural, we shall present some observations by and about mental patients taken from a recently completed study.3 Finally, we shall suggest that the perspective of persons who are on is akin or identical to the view seemingly attributed by the dramaturgic analyst to his subjects, that is, to persons plying their routine rounds of daily activities. We shall hold that this seeming attribution is a misreading of dramaturgic analysis, if a misreading against which the dramaturgic analyst has not sufficiently guarded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Messinger et al. (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: