Why the study?
The burden of thromboembolic diseases has increased in India, but there is a gap between diagnosis and treatment and an absence of clinical consensus on using various anticoagulation therapies.
This consensus document provides tailored, evidence-based recommendations for oral anticoagulation therapy in the Indian clinical context.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expert consensus may guide anticoagulation choices amid India's rising thromboembolic burden; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Over the past decade, the burden of thromboembolic diseases has increased in India; however, there is a huge gap between the diagnosis and treatment of these ailments. This is further complicated by the presence of various options for anticoagulation therapy and the absence of a clinical consensus on the use of these anticoagulants. To address this issue and establish consensus statements on the use of anticoagulation therapy in Indian settings, an expert consensus was developed in alignment with the latest available evidence. A group of 38 clinical experts discussed, in detail, various case-based scenarios on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), anticoagulation for patients with valvular heart disease, stroke, or deep-vein thrombosis. Anticoagulation management options for special populations, including patients with renal dysfunction, elderly patients, and pregnant women, were also discussed in detail. The key opinions the experts (cardiologists, cardiovascular and thoracic surgeons, consulting physicians, and neurologists) are intended to address gaps in Indian clinical practice concerning anticoagulation therapy. Based on scientific evidence, clinical experience, and guidelines on the use of anticoagulation therapy, various consensus statements were proposed. This document was drafted, reviewed, validated, and modified by the expert panel until a final agreement was reached. This pioneering consensus document will lay the foundation for future anticoagulation education modules based on evidence-based treatment approaches for Indian clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menon et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: