Why the study?
Consultant physicians in India face challenges and apprehensions regarding screening, diagnosing, and managing non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with anticoagulation.
Does NOAC therapy prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the primary care setting?
Does NOAC therapy prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the primary care setting?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This expert consensus provides simplified, guideline-supported recommendations for primary care physicians in India to improve the screening, diagnosis, and management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation using NOACs.
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, is linked with substantial morbidity and mortality due to accompanying risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Patients with AF are at a five-fold higher risk of suffering from a stroke. Anticoagulation therapy, with either vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), is a standard approach to reduce the risk. Consultant physicians (CPs) in India are the primary point of contact for the majority of patients before they approach a specialist. The CPs may face challenges in screening and diagnosing AF patients. The apprehensions associated with managing AF patients with anticoagulants, further add to the challenges of a CP. This review aimed to identify the key decision points for the CPs to diagnose AF and initiate anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) and bring to the table a simplified recommendation supported by expert opinion and guidelines for stroke prevention in NVAF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalal et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: