Why the study?
High on-treatment platelet reactivity has been suggested as a risk factor in ischemic vascular disease, prompting evaluation of a predictive model for clopidogrel reactivity and its link to clinical outcomes.
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel predict major adverse clinical events in patients with acute ischemic vascular events?
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel predict major adverse clinical events in patients with acute ischemic vascular events?
High on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel, predicted by factors like age, BMI, diabetes, and CYP2C19 variants, is significantly associated with an increased risk of long-term major adverse clinical events.
Model may aid HTPR risk stratification on clopidogrel; leaves open whether it improves outcomes or guides therapy.
BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) has been suggested as a risk factor for patients with ischemic vascular disease. We explored a predictive model of platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and the relationship with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 441 patients were included. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry after receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. HTPR was defined by the consensus cutoff of maximal platelet aggregation >46% by light transmittance aggregometry. CYP2C19 loss-of-function polymorphisms were identified by DNA microarray analysis. The data were compared by binary logistic regression to find the risk factors. The primary endpoint was major adverse clinical events (MACEs), and patients were followed for a median time of 29 months. Survival curves were constructed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared by log-rank tests between the patients with HTPR and non-HTPR. RESULTS: The rate of HTPR was 17.2%. Logistic regression identified the following predictors of HTPR: age, therapy regimen, body mass index, diabetes history, CYP2C192, or CYP2C193 variant. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic for the HTPR predictive model was 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.738-0.848). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with HTPR had a higher incidence of MACE than those with non-HTPR (21.1% vs. 9.9%; χ = 7.572, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that advanced age, higher body mass index, treatment with regular dual antiplatelet therapy, diabetes, and CYP2C192 or CYP2C193 carriers are significantly associated with HTPR to clopidogrel. The predictive model of HTPR has useful discrimination and good calibration and may predict long-term MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: