Key result
In patients with ischemic stroke or TIA treated with clopidogrel, the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity was 40% at 7 days and 42% at 90 days, with poor agreement between tests.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence and stability of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease treated with clopidogrel?
Observational (n=18)
What is the prevalence and stability of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease treated with clopidogrel?
A high and stable prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity exists in cerebrovascular disease patients on clopidogrel, but different platelet function tests show poor agreement in categorizing this phenotype.
High on-treatment platelet reactivity remains common and stable in clopidogrel-treated stroke/TIA patients; leaves open whether platelet function testing improves outcomes.
High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), referred to as a higher than expected platelet reactivity in patients under antiplatelet therapy, could influence outcome in cerebrovascular disease (CVD), but its prevalence and its stability over time is uncertain. Platelet reactivity was assessed in 18 patients with ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) 7 days (D7) and 90 days (D90) after prescription of clopidogrel, using four methods: light transmission aggregometry with 5 μmol/l ADP (LTA-ADP), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Verify Now P2Y12 and platelet function analyzer (PFA) P2Y. HTPR was defined as LTA-ADP more than 46%; PFA-100-P2Y closure time less than 106 s; VerifyNow P2Y12, PRU greater than 235, VASP, PRI greater than 50%. Patients displayed, both at D7 and D90, a marked inhibition of platelet reactivity towards ADP in all tests as compared with reference levels. Correlations between the results obtained with all the tests at D7 and D90 and between measurements on each day in each test were low-to-moderate. The prevalence of HTPR for all the tests was 40% at D7 and 42% at D90. There was a moderate degree of agreement (k statistic < 0.5) between tests with regard to categorizing patients as HTPR/No-HTPR (D7 and D90). The on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity phenotype, HTPR/No-HTPR, remained stable in 55-72% of patients, depending on the test. A high prevalence of HTPR is found among CVD patients treated with clopidogrel and this platelet reactivity phenotype remains over time. There is poor agreement between the different platelet function tests for categorizing the platelet reactivity phenotype in these patients. The new PFA-100 P2Y equals other platelet function assays for evaluating HTPR in CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jover et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Ischemic cerebrovascular disease (stroke/TIA) (n=18). Clopidogrel was evaluated on Prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). In patients with ischemic stroke or TIA treated with clopidogrel, the prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity was 40% at 7 days and 42% at 90 days, with poor agreement between tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: