Key result
High on-treatment platelet reactivity during aspirin use in patients with peripheral arterial disease was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI 1.43-9.81; p=0.007).
Why the study?
Evidence on measurement methods, prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), and its relationship with adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD needed evaluation.
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) increase adverse cardiovascular and limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease?
Systematic Review (n=11,201)
Does high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) increase adverse cardiovascular and limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease?
Hazard Ratio: 3.73 (95% CI 1.43–9.81)
p-value: p=.007
High on-treatment platelet reactivity is prevalent in PAD patients and is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular and limb events, suggesting a potential role for tailored antiplatelet therapy.
Objectives To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients. Methods A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021. Results A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43–9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review. Conclusion No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goncalves et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Peripheral arterial disease (n=11,201). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) vs. Patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73, 95% CI 1.43-9.81, p=.007). High on-treatment platelet reactivity during aspirin use in patients with peripheral arterial disease was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI 1.43-9.81; p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: