This review summarizes the mechanisms, evaluation methods, and clinical implications of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with coronary or peripheral arterial disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Synthesizes HPR literature for arterial disease; leaves open standardization of testing and management strategies.
Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel or both is the standard care for patients with proven coronary or peripheral arterial disease, especially those undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures. However, despite the administration of the antiplatelet regiments, some patients still experience recurrent cardiovascular ischemic events. So far, it is well documented by several studies that in vitro response of platelets may be extremely variable. Poor antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel or high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is under investigation by numerous recent studies. This review article focuses on methods used for the ex vivo evaluation of HTPR, as well as on the possible underlying mechanisms and the clinical consequences of this entity. Alternative therapeutic options and future directions are also addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2015 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: