Key result
Intensified antiplatelet therapy in patients with high platelet reactivity reduced cardiovascular events to a level equivalent to patients with normal reactivity (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.59-1.99).
Why the study?
Does intensified antiplatelet therapy reduce cardiovascular events in stable angina or NSTE-ACS patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=923)
Does intensified antiplatelet therapy reduce cardiovascular events in stable angina or NSTE-ACS patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 1.08 (95% CI 0.59–1.99)
p-value: p=<0.001
Tailoring antiplatelet therapy by intensifying treatment in PCI patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel effectively mitigates their excess risk of ischemic events.
AIM: To investigate whether an intensified antiplatelet regimen could improve prognosis in stable or non-ST elevation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients exhibiting high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a wide variability in the platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and HTPR has been associated with a poor prognosis. METHODS: In this observational study, 923 consecutive patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and adequately pre-treated with clopidogrel were screened for HTPR with multiple electrode aggregometry after assessment of the coronary anatomy. Patients were grouped based on their response to clopidogrel and the assigned antiplatelet strategy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis. RESULTS: HTPR was demonstrated in 237 patients (25.7%). Of these, 114 continued on conventional clopidogrel therapy, while the remaining 123 received intensified antiplatelet therapy with either double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily, n = 55) or the newer P2Y12-inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 68) for at least 30 days after the index procedure. The median follow-up was 571 days (interquartile range, 373-746). Intensifying antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of the composite endpoint (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, HTPR in combination with conventional clopidogrel therapy remained independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR), 2.92; 95% CI, 1.90-4.48), whereas intensified treatment reduced the risk to a level equivalent to that of patients exhibiting normal platelet reactivity (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.59-1.99). CONCLUSION: Tailored antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the event rate in patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dridi et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Stable angina or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (n=923). Intensified antiplatelet therapy vs. Normal platelet reactivity was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.59-1.99, p=<0.001). Intensified antiplatelet therapy in patients with high platelet reactivity reduced cardiovascular events to a level equivalent to patients with normal reactivity (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.59-1.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: