Key result
Ticagrelor reduced major adverse cardiac events compared to clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI (16.7% vs 45.8%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.13-0.98; P=0.03).
Why the study?
Does changing to new P2Y12-receptor antagonists (prasugrel or ticagrelor) reduce composite MACEs in patients with high on treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI compared to clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=181)
Does changing to new P2Y12-receptor antagonists (prasugrel or ticagrelor) reduce composite MACEs in patients with high on treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI compared to clopidogrel?
Relative Risk: 0.36 (95% CI 0.13–0.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 45.8%
p-value: p=0.03
Switching to newer P2Y12 inhibitors like ticagrelor significantly reduces the risk of MACE in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI.
Selective intensification of platelet inhibition may improve high on treatment platelet reactivity (HPR). We evaluated the efficacy of dual-antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel (CPG), compared to new P2Y12-receptor antagonists in patients with HPR undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, regarding the outcome of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, including death, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], and stent restenosis). The presence of HPR (71 of 181 patients) almost doubled the risk of MACEs. The new antiplatelet agent reduced MACEs (45.8%, 26%, and 16.7% for CPG, prasugrel, and ticagrelor [TGL]; RR 0.36; 0.13-0.98, P = .03, TGL), specifically in patients with ACS. Failure to reduce HPR after the antiplatelet change and diabetes were independent predictors for MACEs. The HPR was early and effectively reduced after changing the antiplatelet therapy, but the intensity of this reduction did not significantly decrease the risk of MACEs. These findings support the benefit of HPR-guided intensification of platelet inhibition. Whether the intensity of this reduction improves the patient's clinical outcomes deserves further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robledo‐Nolasco et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in High on treatment platelet reactivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=181). New P2Y12-receptor antagonists (specifically ticagrelor) vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, including death, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], and stent restenosis) (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-0.98, p=0.03). Ticagrelor reduced major adverse cardiac events compared to clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing PCI (16.7% vs 45.8%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.13-0.98; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: