Full-field comparisons between strains predicted by QCT-derived finite element models of the scapula and experimental strains measured by digital volume correlation

Subject-specific finite element models (FEMs) of the shoulder can be used to evaluate joint replacement designs preclinically. However, to ensure accurate conclusions are drawn, experimental validation is critical. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of strain predictions generated by subject-specific scapula FEMs through comparisons against full-field experimental strains measured using digital volume correlation (DVC). Three cadaveric scapulae were mechanically loaded using a custom-hexapod robot within a micro-CT scanner. BoneDVC was used to quantify resultant experimental full-field strains. Scapula FEMs were generated using three different density-modulus relationships to assign material properties. Two types of boundary conditions (BCs) were simulated: DVC-displacement-driven or applied-force-driven. Third principal strains were compared between the DVC measurements and FEM predictions. With applied-force BCs, poor agreement was observed between the predicted and measured strains (slope range: 0.16–0.19, r2 range: 0.04–0.30). Agreement was improved with the use of DVC-displacement BCs (slope range: 0.54–0.59, r2 range: 0.73–0.75). Strain predictions were independent of the density-modulus relationship used for DVC-displacement BCs, but differences were observed in the correlation coefficient and intercept for applied-force BCs. Overall, this study utilized full-field DVC-derived experimental strains for comparison with FEM predicted strains in models with varying material properties and BCs. It was found that fair agreement can be achieved in localized strain measurements between DVC measurements and FEM predictions when DVC-displacement BCs are used. However, performance suffered with use of applied-force BCs.