Why the study?
Are clevidipine and nicardipine effective and cost-saving alternatives to sodium nitroprusside for the management of acute hypertension?
Are clevidipine and nicardipine effective and cost-saving alternatives to sodium nitroprusside for the management of acute hypertension?
Clevidipine and nicardipine serve as effective, cost-saving alternatives to sodium nitroprusside for acute hypertension management in the setting of SNP price hyperinflation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts clinicians to SNP cost barriers in acute hypertension; leaves open optimal vasodilator selection pending pharmacoeconomic analyses.
Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a generically available and rapid-acting intravenous (IV) vasodilator that has been used clinically for decades. Prior to 2013, the cost of SNP was relatively low, and SNP was an affordable option for the treatment of acute hypertension. However, from 2013 to 2017, average wholesale prices for SNP rose to as high as $900 per vial, earning the drug its status as a "hyperinflation drug." Hyperinflation drugs such as SNP pose a significant challenge for pharmacy departments. A multidisciplinary effort involving stakeholders from many backgrounds, including pharmacists, physicians, and nurses, is key to developing an effective plan to address the problem. A therapeutic interchange, wherein a drug with similar efficacy is substituted for another, is often an appropriate strategy in this scenario. Fortunately, alternative drugs with a solid evidence base exist for the management of acute hypertension. The dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, clevidipine and nicardipine, are IV titratable antihypertensive agents with favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Various studies indicate that clevidipine and nicardipine are effective alternatives to SNP for indications including hypertensive crisis and postoperative hypertension. Some hospitals have reported significant cost savings without adverse outcomes by substituting clevidipine or nicardipine for SNP. This article is intended to serve as a review of the evidence for clevidipine and nicardipine as potential substitutes for SNP and to provide strategies to successfully implement this therapeutic interchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cobb et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: