Why the study?
Does dofetilide improve acute conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does dofetilide improve acute conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Dofetilide demonstrates a high, dose-dependent acute pharmacological conversion rate for persistent atrial fibrillation in a relatively healthy cohort and is well tolerated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dofetilide for acute conversion in selected persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Dofetilide (D) is a highly selective blocker of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current and was approved for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) based on a satisfactory safety/efficacy profile from trials in patients with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction or heart failure. The dose-dependant acute conversion rates (<72 hours) were reported to be in the range of 6-30%. We hypothesized that the acute pharmacological conversion rate of D is higher than previously reported if used in a healthier cohort of patients with persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients received D dosing per Cockroft-Gault adjustment for creatinine clearance and QTc intervals. Patients were 61 +/- 10 years, 79% male, ejection fraction (EF) 53 +/- 13%, coronary artery disease 20%, and left atrial dimension 4.1 +/- 0.2 cms. The duration of the treated AF episode was a median of 19 days (range 10-113 days). All patients received D while on telemetry for at least six dosing intervals. After 2.2 +/- 1.2 doses, 77% of patients converted to sinus rhythm (SR) and 23% did not and required direct current (DC) cardioversion. Acute pharmacological conversion rates were: 20% for D 125 mcg bid, 44% for 250 mcg bid, and 85% for 500 mcg bid. None of the patients had torsade de pointes and none had to stop D for intolerance. Failure to convert to SR on D alone was associated with larger left atrium (LA) diameter (P = 0.04), longer duration of AF (P = 0.02), and use of lower dosages of D (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: D had an unusually high pharmacological conversion rate, demonstrated an incremental dose response, and was well tolerated and safe, in a relatively healthy adult cohort with persistent AF. In addition to D dose, pharmaco-conversion was predicted by LA size and AF duration. D is a desirable alternative for conversion of AF in a variety of clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotiga et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: