Why the study?
Does a non-invasive gas exchange based estimate of pulmonary vascular capacitance track the pulmonary vascular response to exercise compared to invasive measurements in heart failure patients?
Does a non-invasive gas exchange based estimate of pulmonary vascular capacitance track the pulmonary vascular response to exercise compared to invasive measurements in heart failure patients?
Noninvasive gas exchange measures strongly correlate with invasive pulmonary vascular capacitance, providing a simple method to track pulmonary vascular responses to exercise in heart failure.
May enable noninvasive tracking of pulmonary vascular capacitance during exercise in HF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We determined whether a non-invasive gas exchange based estimate of pulmonary vascular (PV) capacitance [PVCAP = stroke volume (SV) × pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa)] (GXCAP) tracked the PV response to exercise in heart-failure (HF) patients. Pulmonary wedge pressure (Ppw), Ppa, PV resistance (PVR), and gas exchange were measured simultaneously during cycle exercise in 42 HF patients undergoing right-heart catheterization. During exercise, PETCO2 and VE/VCO2 were related to each other (r = -0.93, P < 0.01) and similarly related to mean Ppa (mPpa) (r = -0.39 and 0.36; P < 0.05); PETCO2 was subsequently used as a metric of mPpa. Oxygen pulse (O2 pulse) tracked the SV response to exercise (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). Thus, GXCAP was calculated as O2 pulse × PETCO2. During exercise, invasively determined PVCAP and non-invasive GXCAP were related (r = 0.86, P < 0.01), and GXCAP correlated with mPpa and PVR (r = -0.46 and -0.54; P < 0.01). In conclusion, noninvasive gas exchange measures may represent a simple way to track the PV response to exercise in HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: