Why the study?
Does continuation of established beta-blocker therapy increase the risk of complications in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction?
Does continuation of established beta-blocker therapy increase the risk of complications in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction?
Continuation of established beta-blocker therapy does not appear to increase the risk of early complications after hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction.
May support continuing beta-blockers on acute MI admission; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
In order to evaluate the risks and benefits of continuing established therapy with beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs during acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 183 consecutive patients, 63 with (beta-blocker group) and 120 without (control group) this therapy, were studied. Detailed information on previous diseases, present symptoms, established medication, clinical and laboratory findings on admission and during the first 12 hours in the CCU was collected. The incidences of congestive heart failure, hypotension, AV blocks and ventricular arrhythmias were not significantly more common in the control group (8 vs. 28%, p less than 0.01). Thus, continuation of established therapy with beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs does not seem to increase the risk of complications after hospital admission for AMI. The reason for the low incidence of inferior wall infarction in the beta-blocker group is not clear but it cannot be excluded that when patients on beta-adrenergic receptor blocking therapy develop an inferior AMI, they may run a greater risk of sudden death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlström et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: