It has been suggested that the ability of quantum mechanics to allow secure distribution of secret key together with its inability to allow bit commitment or communicate superluminally might be sufficient to imply the rest of quantum mechanics. I argue using a toy theory as a counterexample that this is not the case. I further discuss whether an additional axiom (key storage) brings back the quantum nature of the theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John A. Smolin (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: