Why the study?
Hypertension and AF commonly coexist and worsen prognosis, but uncertainties remain regarding automated oscillometric BP measurement in AF patients.
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide reliable blood pressure measurements during atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide reliable blood pressure measurements during atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is feasible and informative in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, yielding similar mean arterial pressure values as during sinus rhythm.
Supports ambulatory BP monitoring reliability for mean arterial pressure in paroxysmal AF; leaves open prospective outcome validation before routine adoption.
The coexistence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and accounts for a worse prognosis. Uncertainties exist regarding blood pressure (BP) measurements in AF patients by automated oscillometric devices. The Microlife WatchBP 03 AFIB ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device including an AF algorithm with each measurement was used in 430 subjects aged >65 years referred for ABPM and with assumed paroxysmal AF to perform intra-individual comparisons of BP during both AF-indicated and sinus rhythm. Only subjects with >30% of measurements indicating AF and episodes >30 min for assumed AF and for sinus rhythm were included. Mean age was 78 ± 7 years, 43% were male, 77% hypertensive, and 72% were treated. Compared to sinus rhythm, 24-h mean arterial pressure was similar (87.2 ± 9.5 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 mm Hg, p = 0.47), whereas 24-h systolic BP tended to be lower (123.6 ± 13.9 vs 124.7 ± 16.1 mm Hg, p = 0.05) and night-time diastolic BP higher (64.6 ± 10.9 vs 63.3 ± 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.01) in assumed AF. Diastolic (not systolic) BP variability was higher in AF (p < 0.001). Results were similar with heart rates <90 and ≥90 bpm. In conclusion, this is the first study to use intra-individual comparisons of averaged BP during an ABPM in assumed paroxysmal AF and sinus rhythm. Our results imply that ABPM is feasible and informative also in patients with AF. We also suggest that an AF detection algorithm offers a new approach to evaluate the reliability of averaged BP values in AF compared to SR during an ABPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lundwall et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: