Why the study?
Do dynamic indices (SVV, PPV, PVI) predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice?
Do dynamic indices (SVV, PPV, PVI) predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice?
Pulse pressure variation (PPV) has moderate predictive value for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice, whereas SVV and PVI do not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PPV may inform fluid decisions in ventilated obstructive jaundice; leaves open SVV/PVI utility pending validation.
Previous studies have shown that the stroke volume variation (SVV), the pulse pressure variation (PPV) and the pleth variability index (PVI) could be successfully used for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in surgical patients. The aim of this study was to validate the ability of SVV, PPV and PVI to predict intraoperative FR in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice (OJ). Thirty-two patients with OJ (mean serum total bilirubin 190.5 ± 95.3 µmol L(-1)) received intraoperative volume expansion (VE) with 250 ml colloids immediately after an exploratory laparotomy had been completed and after a 5 min period of hemodynamic stability. Hemodynamic variables were recorded before and after VE. FR was defined as an increase in stroke volume index > 10% after VE. The ability of SVV, PPV and PVI to predict FR was assessed by calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Eleven (34%) patients were responders and 21 patients were nonresponders to VE. The PPV was the unique dynamic index that had the moderate ability to predict FR during surgical procedures, the area under the curve was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.523 to 0.856; P = 0.039) and the threshold (sensitivity and specificity) discriminated responders was 7.5% (63.6%/71.4%). The present study concluded that SVV and PVI were not reliable predictors of FR, but PPV has some value predicting FR in patients with OJ intraoperatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pei et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: