Why the study?
Fluid responsiveness testing helps optimize perioperative fluid administration, and investigators hypothesized that changes in perfusion index during a lung recruitment maneuver could predict fluid responsiveness.
Does the change in perfusion index during a lung recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during surgery?
Does the change in perfusion index during a lung recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during surgery?
The change in perfusion index during a lung recruitment maneuver can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during open abdominal surgery.
Hypothesis-generating for PI-guided fluid optimization; leaves open clinical adoption pending validation.
Introduction Excessive or inadequate fluid administration during perioperative period affects outcomes. Adjustment of volume expansion (VE) by performing fluid responsiveness (FR) test plays an important role in optimizing fluid infusion. Since changes in stroke volume (SV) during lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) can predict FR, and peripheral perfusion index (PI) is related to SV; therefore, we hypothesized that the changes in PI during LRM (ΔPI LRM ) could predict FR during perioperative period. Methods Patients who were scheduled for elective non-laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia with a mechanical ventilator and who required VE (250 mL of crystalloid solution infusion over 10 min) were included. Before VE, LRM was performed by a continuous positive airway pressure of 30 cm H 2 O for 30 sec; hemodynamic variables with their changes (PI, obtained by pulse oximetry; and ΔPI LRM , calculated by using [(PI before LRM—PI after LRM)/PI before LRM] * 100) were obtained before and after LRM. After SV (measured by esophageal doppler) and PI had returned to the baseline values, VE was infused, and the values of these variables were recorded again, before and after VE. Fluid responders (Fluid-Res) were defined by an increase in SV ≥10% after VE. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the baseline values and ΔPI LRM were constructed and reported as areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals, to predict FR. Results Of 32 mechanically ventilated adult patients included, 13 (41%) were in the Fluid-Res group. Before VE and LRM, there were no differences in the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, SV, and PI between patients in the Fluid-Res and fluid non-responders (Fluid-NonRes) groups. After LRM, SV, MAP, and, PI decreased in both groups, ΔPI LRM was greater in the Fluid-Res group than in Fluid-NonRes group (55.2 ± 17.8% vs. 35.3 ± 17.3%, p < 0.001, respectively). After VE, only SV and cardiac index increased in the Fluid-Res group. ΔPI LRM had the highest AUC [0.81 (0.66–0.97)] to predict FR with a cut-off value of 40% (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 73.7%). Conclusions ΔPI LRM can be applied to predict FR in mechanical ventilated patients during the perioperative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morakul et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: