Key result
SV variation >16% during a recruitment maneuver accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in abdominal surgery.
Why the study?
Does the variation in stroke volume during a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients receiving protective ventilation during abdominal surgery?
Observational (n=60)
Does the variation in stroke volume during a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients receiving protective ventilation during abdominal surgery?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99)
p-value: p=< 0.0001
In patients undergoing abdominal surgery with protective ventilation, a stroke volume variation >16% during a recruitment maneuver accurately predicts fluid responsiveness.
May guide fluid assessment in protectively ventilated abdominal surgery; hypothesis-generating from observational data, needs prospective validation.
During abdominal surgery, the use of protective ventilation with a low tidal volume, positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) may limit the applicability of dynamic preload indices. The objective of the present study was to establish whether or not the variation in stroke volume (SV) during an RM could predict fluid responsiveness.We prospectively included patients receiving protective ventilation (tidal volume: 6 mL kg, PEEP: 5-7 cmH2O; RMs). Hemodynamic variables, such as heart rate, arterial pressure, SV, cardiac output (CO), respiratory variation in SV (ΔrespSV) and pulse pressure (ΔrespPP), and the variation in SV (ΔrecSV) as well as pulse pressure (ΔrecPP) during an RM were measured at baseline, at the end of the RM, and after fluid expansion. Responders were defined as patients with an SV increase of at least 15% after infusion of 500 mL of crystalloid solution.Thirty-seven (62%) of the 60 included patients were responders. Responders and nonresponders differed significantly in terms of the median ΔrecSV (26% [19-37] vs 10% [4-12], respectively; P < 0.0001). A ΔrecSV value more than 16% predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AU) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.99; P < 0.0001) and a narrow gray zone between 15% and 17%. The area under the curve values for ΔrecPP and ΔrespSV were, respectively, 0.81 (95%CI: 0.7-0.91; P = 0.0001) and 0.80 (95%CI: 0.70-0.94; P < 0.0001). ΔrespPP did not predict fluid responsiveness.During abdominal surgery with protective ventilation, a ΔrecSV value more than 16% accurately predicted fluid responsiveness and had a narrow gray zone (between 15% and 17%). ΔrecPP and ΔrespSV (but not ΔrespPP) were also predictive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Broca et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Abdominal surgery with protective ventilation (n=60). Variation in stroke volume during a recruitment maneuver (ΔrecSV) vs. Other dynamic preload indices (ΔrecPP, ΔrespSV, ΔrespPP) was evaluated on Fluid responsiveness (stroke volume increase ≥15% after 500 mL crystalloid infusion) (AUROC 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p=< 0.0001). A variation in stroke volume during a recruitment maneuver >16% accurately predicted fluid responsiveness during abdominal surgery with protective ventilation (AUROC 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.99; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: