Key result
Pulse-pressure variation and dynamic arterial elastance predicted mean arterial pressure responsiveness (AUC 0.79 and 0.75) and stroke volume responsiveness (AUC 0.85 and 0.77) to fluid interventions.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify potential hemodynamic indicators to increase the predictive power of stroke-volume variation for mean arterial pressure and stroke volume fluid responsiveness.
Do pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and dynamic arterial elastance (Edyn) predict MAP and SV fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated SVV undergoing major vascular surgery?
Do pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and dynamic arterial elastance (Edyn) predict MAP and SV fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated SVV undergoing major vascular surgery?
PPV and Edyn show good accuracy for predicting MAP and SV fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated SVV during vascular surgery.
Should not yet change fluid management in vascular surgery; hypothesis-generating for PPV and Edyn in elevated SVV.
OBJECTIVES: The identification of potential hemodynamic indicators to increase the predictive power of stroke-volume variation (SVV) for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV) fluid responsiveness. DESIGN: A prospective intervention study. SETTING: At a single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen patients during major vascular surgery with 125 fluid interventions. INTERVENTIONS: When SVV ≥13% occurred for >30 seconds, 250 mL of Ringer's lactate were given within 2 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables, such as pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and dynamic arterial elastance (Edyn), were measured by pulse power-wave analysis. The outcomes were MAP and SV responsiveness, defined as an increase of at least 10% of MAP and SV within 5 minutes of the fluid intervention. Of the fluid interventions, 48% were MAP-responsive, and 66% were SV-responsive. The addition of PPV and Edyn cut-off values to the SVV cut-off decreased sensitivity from 1-to-0.66 to-0.82, and concomitantly increased specificity from 0-to- 0.65-to-0.93 for the prediction of MAP and SV responsiveness in the authors' study setting. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of PPV and Edyn for the prediction of MAP responsiveness were 0.79 and 0.75, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for PPV and Edyn to predict SV responsiveness were 0.85 and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPV and Edyn showed good accuracy for the prediction of MAP and SV responsiveness in patients with elevated SVV during vascular surgery. Either PPV or Edyn may be used in conjunction with SVV to better predict MAP and SV fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing vascular surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2022) studied Elevated stroke volume variation undergoing major vascular surgery (n=19). Fluid intervention (Ringer's lactate) was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV) responsiveness (increase of at least 10% within 5 minutes of fluid intervention). Pulse-pressure variation and dynamic arterial elastance predicted mean arterial pressure responsiveness (AUC 0.79 and 0.75) and stroke volume responsiveness (AUC 0.85 and 0.77) to fluid interventions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: