Why the study?
Does conventional head-up tilt compared to head-up suspension alter sympathetic vasomotor activity and cardiovascular responses in healthy young subjects?
Does conventional head-up tilt compared to head-up suspension alter sympathetic vasomotor activity and cardiovascular responses in healthy young subjects?
Engagement of antigravity muscles during head-up tilt has additive effects on sympathetic vasoconstrictor and cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress compared to head-up suspension.
Muscle activation may augment orthostatic responses; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter clinical tilt protocols.
We hypothesized that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and cardiovascular responses to the conventional head-up tilt (HUT) are different from those to head-up suspension (HUS) because of antigravity muscle activity. The MSNA from the tibial nerve, heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, and calf blood flow were measured in 13 healthy young subjects. Left atrial diameter was measured by two-dimensional echocardiography in another nine subjects. The resting MSNA and cardiovascular responses at a low level (20 degrees) of orthostasis were similar during both modes. At higher levels (40 and 60 degrees), the responses of MSNA, heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output were significantly stronger and there was a smaller reduction in calf blood flow during HUT than during HUS (P < 0.05). Left atrial diameter was decreased significantly from the resting values during HUT and HUS without any significant difference between the modes of orthostasis. The results provide evidence that the engagement of antigravity muscles during HUT may have additive effects on sympathetic vasoconstrictor and cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shamsuzzaman et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: