Systematic review evaluates cultural governance through state-led tourism narratives, highlighting authority and visibility impacts.
Tourism narratives are often treated as tools of destination marketing, recovery, and promotion. This study argues that state-led tourism narratives also operate as mechanisms through which cultural meaning is organised and governed. Using a systematic literature review with thematic synthesis, it examines 60 studies published between 2010 and 2025 on state-led tourism narratives, heritage representation, and cultural negotiation. The synthesis identifies selective elevation and erasure as coupled mechanisms: selected cultural forms become publicly legible as heritage and destination value, while difficult histories, alternative attachments, and less authorised claims are softened, displaced, or made less visible. It also identifies constrained negotiated agency, as communities, guides, visitors, and intermediaries adapt, withhold, reinterpret, or contest authorised narratives under unequal conditions. The study reframes state-led tourism narratives as cultural governance and argues that narrative-led tourism policy should be evaluated by how it reorganises cultural visibility, authority, memory, and room for negotiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novianti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: