Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study reports outcomes of urgent carotid revascularization in patients with hemispheric hypoperfusion, highlighting its safety and feasibility.
Symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis may present with extensive ipsilateral hemispheric hypoperfusion without a large infarct core, a grey-zone phenotype between standard early and truly urgent carotid revascularization. This single-centre retrospective observational study described the procedural and clinical outcomes of urgent carotid revascularization in this imaging-defined subgroup. Consecutive patients treated between June 2015 and August 2025 were included when they had recent ipsilateral anterior-circulation symptoms, ipsilateral internal carotid stenosis > 70%, objective hemispheric hypoperfusion involving at least one third of the anterior circulation territory on CT or MR perfusion, and no intracranial haemorrhage or large established infarction. Twenty-seven patients met the criteria. Median NASCET-style stenosis was 92%, and 14 patients (51.9%) had at least one collateral-limiting feature. Revascularization was performed within 48 h in all cases, by carotid endarterectomy in 25 patients and carotid artery stenting in two. Technical success was 100%. No 30-day death, stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, major adverse event, or target-lesion reintervention occurred. Complete neurological recovery at discharge was observed in 25 patients (92.6%). During median follow-up of 48.6 months, no late ipsilateral stroke, carotid-related neurological event, neurological death, or target-lesion reintervention was recorded. In this small, selected, uncontrolled cohort, urgent carotid revascularization was technically achievable, and no prespecified 30-day safety events were observed. These descriptive findings do not establish comparative safety or clinical benefit and require prospective multicentre validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marzano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: