Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates engagement with a technology-facilitated mental health program for healthcare workers, suggesting room for improvement in access and utilization.
Healthcare workers (HCWs) report elevated distress. Accessible and personalized mental health intervention programs for HCWs are limited. Technology-based intervention support programs could mitigate adverse health outcomes in HCWs. Using a feasibility approach, we report engagement with a technology-based mental health screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment program designed for HCWs from a quality improvement project. 598 HCWs across seven hospital units were invited to participate. Participants were not recruited as a treatment-seeking sample. HCWs completed a baseline survey and could opt-in to brief, tailored text-based screenings with real-time feedback. HCWs completed a 90-day follow-up survey. Of the 598, 80 (13%) initiated/began the baseline assessment, with 48 (60%) of 80 baseline respondents completing only baseline, and the remaining 32 (40%) completing at least one weekly and/or 90-day follow-up survey. Most respondents were intensive care unit registered nurses ( n = 23; 29%), patient care techs ( n = 10; 13%), or ‘other’ ( n = 38; 48%). Most were aged 18–35 (68%) and female (88%). 17 (25%) of 69 with available referral data requested a referral to a well-being clinician. Average number of views for weekly coping strategy videos was 14 (median = 12). 5% ( n = 4) of the sample reported suicidal ideation. Descriptive statistics (i.e., non-inferential testing) of clinical outcomes on quantitative measures suggested variable symptoms at baseline, with elevated symptoms for some measures. While a small percentage of individuals participated in baseline screening and subsequent activities from the 598 identified, a quarter of 69 requested a referral to well-being services. Results provide insight into use of light-touch interventions for HCWs, informing wraparound services in healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavlacic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: