Review explores multidisciplinary evaluation methods for chronic pelvic pain, suggesting improved diagnostics and treatment pathways.
This review explores transitioning toward a multidisciplinary, biopsychosocial framework for evaluating chronic pelvic pain (CPP), considered a global epidemic. The manuscript introduces the updated FIGO-IPPS CPP definition, which lowers the diagnostic threshold to pain typically lasting 3 months or more and prioritizes functional impairment. Central to this definition is the R U MOVVING SOMe classification system, enabling systematic identification of overlapping pain generators and central sensitization. The authors advocate for a cutting-edge methodology integrating trauma-informed care (TIC), specialized musculoskeletal and neurological examinations, and validated Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). This framework provides clinicians a standardized pathway to optimize diagnostic accuracy and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: