This resource presents tools for dialogue ethics and evidence evaluation in Islamic Ḥiwār practices, suggesting improvements for future applications.
This English supplementary package presents Version 2.0.0 of the Islamic Ḥiwār Framework (IHF) as a Research and Practice Workbook and a Complete Introduction, User Guide and Scientific Boundary. It is designed to support study design, dialogue Case registration, proposition-level evidence, coding, data quality, provisional domain and reporting-lens analysis, qualified theological and dialogue-ethics review, decision, action and conditional release. The workbook includes 14 source-explicit domains, a registry of 280 candidate KPI names, three measurement slots per KPI, an 840-row calculation and evidence-link engine, 53 sheets and four isolated charts. Its scientific status is a pre-validation research instrument: the candidate names are source-explicit, while operational definitions, formulas, translations, owners and reporting lenses are workbook proposals pending specialist and empirical validation. It is not a validated scale, empirical dataset, fatwa engine or institutional/tradition ranking tool. The Islamic Ḥiwār Index (IHI) composite remains disabled until the unresolved 20-slot core, axis conflicts, weighting, raw validation evidence, targets, owners and safeguards are reconciled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SeyyedAbdolHojjat MoghadasNian (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: