Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals measurement strength in memory dynamics, indicating implications for understanding observation effects.
We built a simulator where the true memory dynamics are known, then asked how much of that truth survives under non-oracle partial observations (synthetic branch-summary measurements, not calibrated calcium/EEG models). Oracle finite-difference consistency, propagation calibration, and frozen-writing ablations are separated from non-oracle measurement claims. Observable charts are selective: some motifs support mechanism discrimination, the robust order result is chain inversion, and a lagged branch summary cannot recover a response-generating local operator. The contribution is a map of measurement strength, not a claim that dendritic accessibility is consciousness or that any chart is empirical MNPS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin Langell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: