Key result
Heart rate variability threshold estimated via Discrete Wavelet Transform accurately identified the aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition with no significant difference from ventilatory threshold (MD 0.22%, p=0.74).
Why the study?
Does heart rate variability threshold estimated by Discrete Wavelet Transform correlate with ventilatory threshold 2 during maximal exercise in athletes and non-athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=24)
No
Does heart rate variability threshold estimated by Discrete Wavelet Transform correlate with ventilatory threshold 2 during maximal exercise in athletes and non-athletes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition during maximal exercise can be accurately estimated using heart rate variability threshold measured by Discrete Wavelet Transform, offering a non-invasive alternative to ventilatory thresholds.
Background: The estimate of aerobic-anaerobic threshold is commonly used for exercise prescription in athletes and non-athletes subjects; however, the methods currently used are expensive, and some of them use invasive techniques. The analysis of changes in heart rate variability during exercise may contribute to the introduction of a novel methodology to estimate the aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition. Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) through the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and compare the exercise intensities at which this happens to the moment when the aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition occurs, estimated by the ventilatory threshold 2 (VT2) in athletes and non-athletes. Methods: 24 male subjects were enrolled (12 athletes; 12 non-athletes). Ventilatory parameters and R-R intervals were recorded breath by breath in a maximal incremental intensity exercise. HRVT was estimated through DWT and the VT2 was determined by 5 indicators: respiratory quotient ≥1.0, non-linear increase of the VE and VCO 2 , decrease of the P ET CO 2 and increase of the P ET O 2 . Reserve heart rate frequency percentages (%RHRF) are determined, compared and correlated to VT2 (%RHRF-VT2) and HRVT (%RHRF-HRVT). We used a significance level of p<0.05 for all our analysis. Results: The results showed that there is no significant difference between the %RHRF-VT and %RHRF-HRVT in the assessed subject groups (total, athletes, non-athletes). There is a correlation between %RHRF-VT and %RHRF-HRVT in the whole group (r=0.91; p<0.001), athletes (r=0.84; p<0,001) and non-athletes (r=0.88; p<0,001). Conclusion: We conclude that the aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition (i.e. VT2) during an incremental maximal exercise can be estimated through the HRVT measured by the DWT in athletes and non-athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐Fuenzalida et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy athletes and non-athletes (n=24). Heart rate variability threshold (HRVT) via Discrete Wavelet Transform vs. Ventilatory threshold 2 (VT2) was evaluated on Reserve heart rate frequency percentage (%RHRF) (MD 0.22, p=0.74). Heart rate variability threshold estimated via Discrete Wavelet Transform accurately identified the aerobic-anaerobic metabolic transition with no significant difference from ventilatory threshold (MD 0.22%, p=0.74).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: